I enjoy most of this film, but it would have been better if Anderson cut to the meat of the story sooner. Also, this is one of Wes Anderson’s most stunning movies, as the scenery of the island New Penzance is gorgeous. The movie often feels like it was made from a child’s perspective, which must have been Anderson’s intention. For its remaining hour of runtime, “Moonrise Kingdom” transforms into a touching romantic dramedy about two dysfunctional children falling in love. However, once the two main characters start to bond, the movie really picks up speed. The first 25-30 minutes of the film are generally boring there’s very little character development, drama, or comedy. The problem with “Moonrise Kingdom” is that its second and third acts are infinitely better than its first. It’s not great, it’s not terrible - it’s just average. However, it doesn’t know how to justify its length and ends up forcing what should be a 45-minute story into being 90 minutes. In the end, “Bottle Rocket” is a film with Wes Anderson’s unique sense of humor, great performances, genuine heart, and an original message. No tension, no truly emotional moments, and nothing memorable at all for that matter. The entire middle section of the film is meandering and almost pointless, consisting of a forgettable romance and not much else. That’s a great concept, but when you have a 90-minute movie, it ends up getting stretched out very thin in order to accommodate the runtime. The point that the film clearly wants to make is that crime, in reality, isn’t all that exciting or epic, but rather just creates divisions in people. This film follows Anthony, a man who just got released from a mental institution and is now on the run with Dignan, his best friend who has delusional aspirations of being a criminal mastermind. I’ve only seen the feature-film, but it’s clear to me that the premise would work far better in a shorter, more constricting runtime. “Bottle Rocket” is a feature-length version of the short film Wes Anderson and co-writer/star Owen Wilson made together in 1994, two years prior to the release of this 1996 film. Overall, this is a somewhat mediocre film, and I expect much better from a filmmaker as talented as Wes Anderson. The performances are terrific, the animation is breathtaking, the score is very memorable, and the dog Chief, played by Bryan Cranston, was compelling. Now, this is by no means a horrible film. The central concept here is that dogs all get a disease and are dumped onto an island where they have to fend for themselves and all they have to eat is garbage. Besides the massive tonal issue, the film is mean-spirited and sometimes hard to watch, at least for anyone who likes dogs. It feels like Anderson wanted to make a PG movie, but since he put some blood and gore into it the MPAA had to give it a PG-13 rating. Fox,” but it’s not targeted toward adults either. It’s not a family-friendly film like the far superior “Fantastic Mr. The movie goes from being sad to joyful to dreary to hopeful over and over again, and it’s never able to decide what it wants to be. “Isle of Dogs” is the only Wes Anderson film where he lost control over the film’s tone. Here’s my ranking of all 10 Wes Anderson movies! He also has a great track record of films. Wes Anderson is one of the most unique filmmakers working today due to his perfectly centered shots and unusual tone that’s simultaneously funny and melancholy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |